In 2025, Mohamad Fakih, founder of the Paramount Foods empire and a member of the Order of Canada, is facing backlash for comments made on social media. His remarks have sparked outrage among various groups, particularly within the Jewish community. Critics argue that his statements undermine the values of Canadian citizenship.

On August 25, Fakih posted, "If you are a Canadian and a supporter of Israel, you do not have basic human values, let alone Canadian values." This comment has drawn significant criticism for its sweeping generalization about supporters of Israel, which many see as an attack on a large segment of the Canadian population, including many Jewish Canadians who hold diverse views on Israel's actions.

Fakih's comments have led to calls for his removal from the Order of Canada. Supporters, including New Democrats and human rights lawyer Alex Neve, have defended him, stating that he embodies the values of the Order. However, some argue that his statements violate the principle that individuals should be free to hold their beliefs without facing discrimination.

In response to the backlash, Fakih claimed that a "coordinated, well-funded pro-Israel campaign" is targeting him, his reputation, and his business. He stated, "All because I speak the truth about the genocide in Gaza." This assertion has been met with skepticism, as many believe the criticism stems from his controversial comments rather than a conspiracy against him.

The situation has prompted discussions about the expectations of individuals who receive national honors. Liberal MP Kevin Vuong has introduced a petition with multi-partisan support, emphasizing that the Order of Canada should represent unity rather than division. The petition states, "The Order of Canada is for our very best; its recipients should unify, not divide."

Fakih's case highlights the complexities of public discourse in a polarized environment, where social media can amplify misunderstandings and lead to significant consequences for public figures. As the debate continues, many are reflecting on the implications of his statements and the broader conversation about free speech and accountability in Canada.