Title: Prosecutors Challenge Erin Patterson's Parole Eligibility

Prosecutors in Victoria are appealing the life sentence of Erin Patterson, who was convicted of murdering three relatives using toxic mushrooms. They argue that the judge made an error in assessing her potential for solitary confinement, which influenced the decision to allow for a non-parole period.

Last month, Supreme Court Justice Christopher Beale sentenced Patterson to life in prison with a non-parole period of 33 years. This means she could be eligible for parole in 2056, when she will be 82 years old. The judge cited Patterson's harsh prison conditions, where she spends at least 22 hours a day in a maximum-security cell, as a significant factor in his decision.

However, prosecutors contend that the judge's belief that Patterson would remain in solitary confinement for years was unfounded. They argue that this assumption affected his judgment regarding her future prison conditions and the non-parole period. The Director of Public Prosecutions, Diana Piekusis KC, stated, "The sentencing judge erred in finding that there was a 'substantial chance' [Patterson] would be held in 'solitary confinement for years to come' when such a finding was not open on the evidence."

The appeal was filed on Monday, with prosecutors describing the sentence as "manifestly inadequate" given the severity of Patterson's crimes. She was convicted of the premeditated murders of Heather Wilkinson, Don Patterson, and Gail Patterson, as well as the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson.

During the sentencing, Justice Beale acknowledged the extraordinary media attention surrounding Patterson, which could make her a target for other inmates. He noted that she had been in solitary confinement for 15 months and that her safety was at risk.

Patterson's defense team has also indicated plans to appeal her conviction. They have until the end of the day to file their appeal, but a new court practice allows for automatic extensions of up to 28 days.

If Patterson's appeal is successful, the Court of Appeal could either reduce or increase her sentence. If the appeal is dismissed, her original sentence will remain in effect.

The appeal hearing date for the prosecution has not yet been scheduled. Patterson's case has drawn significant public interest, and the legal proceedings are expected to continue to attract attention as they unfold.