Quebec has unveiled a controversial proposed constitution that raises questions about the province's autonomy and its implications for rights. This development echoes a significant political moment from 2006 when the Bloc Québécois leader, Gilles Duceppe, sought to declare Quebecers a nation. At that time, the Conservative government, led by Stephen Harper, countered with a motion stating that "the Québécois form a nation within a united Canada." This motion sparked resignations and discontent among Indigenous groups who felt excluded from the discussion.

Fast forward to today, Quebec's new constitution is seen by some as a step toward undermining rights. Current legislation, such as Bills 21 and 96, which impose restrictions on religious symbols and further limit the rights of anglophones, is already facing legal challenges. Additionally, proposals to ban public prayer and restrict religious symbols in schools are being considered, reflecting a growing trend of limiting individual freedoms in the name of provincial identity.

The proposed constitution suggests significant changes, including the appointment of the lieutenant governor by the premier instead of the Governor General, indicating a move away from the monarchy. Critics argue that Quebec lacks the authority to make such changes unilaterally. However, the province has already taken steps that challenge this notion, such as allowing members of the National Assembly (MNAs) to opt out of swearing allegiance to the king, a move that went largely unchallenged.

The new constitution also aims to enshrine rights related to abortion and euthanasia, which Quebec has already implemented through advanced directives for patients. This raises further questions about the province's ability to legislate in areas that may conflict with federal laws.

The 2006 nationhood motion is viewed by some as a turning point that has led to increased concessions from federal parties to Quebec's demands. Critics argue that this has weakened the federal government's ability to respond effectively to Quebec's actions. The current political landscape shows that federal parties, including the Liberals and Conservatives, are struggling to navigate the complexities of Quebec's evolving identity and demands.

As Quebec moves forward with its proposed constitution, the implications for both provincial and federal governance remain uncertain. The ongoing legal battles and political maneuvers will likely shape the future of Quebec's relationship with the rest of Canada.