When you ignore any facts that do not fit your desired outcome, and cherry-pick those that do, it’s called intellectual dishonesty. Russ Neal’s latest opinion piece is a prime example of that.

Let’s start with the first paragraph in which Mr. Neal says that I implied that, “children have a right to access books impacting their moral and religious upbringing independent of their parents.” Simply because I made the point that the First Amendment does not differentiate by age.

He utterly ignores several paragraphs later where I also state that I agree that not all books are suitable for all children and that parents are best equipped to make that decision. I was simply making the point that he, or the unqualified “book review commission”, should not be making that choice for MY children – t

See Full Page