The recent Ontario tariff advertisement featuring President Ronald Reagan has sparked significant discussion, particularly in light of President Donald Trump's reaction. The ad has been credited with several notable benefits, highlighting contrasts between the two presidents' approaches to leadership and policy.

First, the ad serves as a reminder of Reagan's political and economic philosophy, which differs from Trump's. While Trump often poses in front of Reagan's portrait and has adopted some of his slogans, such as "Make America Great Again," he does not embody Reagan's principles. Reagan spent 16 years articulating his vision, from his early speeches supporting Barry Goldwater to his two terms as California governor and his presidential campaigns. The radio address featured in the Ontario ad showcases Reagan's calm and reasoned approach, devoid of theatrics or personal attacks.

Second, Reagan's radio addresses were a hallmark of his presidency, reflecting respect for the electorate. He used these addresses to explain his policies and engage with the public, treating them as intelligent participants in the democratic process. This tradition has faded in recent years, particularly under Trump, who abandoned similar practices early in his presidency.

Third, the ad resonated with the American public, particularly given Trump's low approval ratings. Unlike Reagan, who maintained popularity throughout his presidency, Trump faces skepticism regarding his trade policies. Many Americans are confused by Trump's trade war with Canada, especially when they are more accustomed to positive sentiments toward their northern neighbor.

Fourth, the proposed 10 percent tariff increase on Canadian goods has drawn criticism for its arbitrary nature. The ad highlights the inconsistency in Trump's trade policy, which has raised concerns among American consumers and manufacturers who rely on Canadian imports.

Fifth, Trump's negative response to the ad could weaken his position in an upcoming Supreme Court case regarding the legality of his tariffs. The administration has faced setbacks in lower courts, and Trump's reaction to a commercial may not be viewed as a legitimate national emergency by the justices.

Sixth, the backlash from Republican senators against Trump's denigration of Canada indicates a shift in party dynamics. Some Republican senators joined Democrats in efforts to repeal the tariffs on Canada, signaling that Trump's approach may not align with the party's traditional values regarding international relations.

Finally, for conservatives who question Trump's adherence to conservative principles, the ad serves as a reminder of Reagan's legacy. The juxtaposition of Reagan's conservatism against Trump's approach has sparked discussions about the true nature of conservatism in contemporary politics. Overall, the Ontario tariff ad has reignited conversations about leadership styles and the impact of trade policies on American society.