As the New Democratic Party (NDP) prepares for its leadership race, a pressing question arises for the candidates: How will they address concerns from members and supporters who seek to limit freedom of speech in the name of social justice? Two notable examples highlight this issue.

Manitoba NDP MP Leah Gazan has proposed legislation that would criminalize public dissent against her views on residential schools. In her second attempt to pass a private member’s bill, she aims to make it illegal to condone, deny, downplay, or justify the existence of these schools. This raises concerns for individuals like Tomson Highway, who has publicly shared a positive experience from his time in a residential school.

In another instance, former NDP MP Charlie Angus has advocated for sanctions against those who express differing opinions on the oil and gas industry. While they may not currently hold positions of power to enforce their views, their ability to influence public discourse from their roles in government is noteworthy.

Freedom of expression is a fundamental right protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and is a cornerstone of Western liberal values. It is essential that members of Parliament defend this right vigorously. The question remains: By what authority do Gazan and Angus seek to restrict this freedom?

Both MPs may argue that their views reflect the opinions of many Canadians, but this does not justify limiting permissible speech. Freedom of expression is designed to protect all lawful speech, including minority and unpopular opinions, which often require the most protection.

The broader issue extends beyond individual politicians. Society must remain vigilant in safeguarding rights and freedoms, especially in an era marked by increasing censorship. Gazan and Angus are not alone in their attempts to silence opposing voices; many activists across various movements share similar goals.

In today's polarized climate, differences often lead to divisions, with groups unwilling to engage in constructive dialogue. Protesters frequently aim to marginalize and silence their opponents, while many bystanders choose to remain uninvolved.

As the NDP leadership race unfolds, candidates must be prepared to answer whether they support the initiatives of Gazan and Angus. They should also articulate their plans to protect freedom of expression as potential leaders of the party. With five or more candidates in the running, this issue will be crucial in shaping the party's future direction.