For years, federal policymakers have tweaked lung cancer screening guidelines as if the barrier to saving lives is a math problem. Add a few years to the eligibility age. Drop a few pack-years — a measure combining how much and how long someone has smoked. Remove a quit-time rule. Repeat.
But it was never really a math problem. A new study in JAMA Network Open makes clear what many of us in cancer prevention and control have been warning for over a decade: No amount of technical adjusting will fix a system built on stigma.
I see the effects of this every day. As a behavioral scientist and nurse practitioner, I’ve sat with hundreds of patients confronting the potential of a lung cancer diagnosis. I’ve watched people brace themselves before they say the words “I used to smoke,” even wh

STAT News

AlterNet
Reuters US Domestic
CNN Politics
The radio station 99.5 The Apple
Raw Story
WOWT
The Conversation
Asheville Citizen Times
E Online