Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
On Tuesday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court took a major step toward striking down the state’s congressional map, an extreme Republican gerrymander that blatantly discriminates against Democratic voters. The majority appointed a pair of three-judge panels to decide whether the map violates the state constitution and, if so, whether the judiciary must impose a fairer substitute. Its decision prompted dissents from the court’s conservative members—including Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, who suggested that the imposition of a more balanced map would violate the U.S. Constitution. To make that point, Ziegler quoted a recent Supreme Court decision, Moore v. Harper

Slate Politics

Local News in New York
Omak Okanogan County Chronicle
AlterNet
Raw Story
TMJ4 News
The Atlantic
Tampa Bay Times Health
New York Post