The Carney government is facing scrutiny as its initial support begins to wane. Critics are already looking for alternatives to the current administration's policies. The recent federal budget has drawn criticism for blaming Canada’s economic challenges on global events and tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump. Critics argue it fails to address the consequences of a decade of mismanagement under the previous Trudeau administration.

The budget also continues to emphasize a commitment to achieving net-zero emissions, a priority for Carney. However, some suggest an alternative approach: a federal commitment to balancing the budget by 2030. This would involve aligning federal expenditures with revenues, which may necessitate significant reductions in the federal bureaucracy. Critics of the current downsizing strategy argue that allowing the bureaucracy to manage its own cuts is ineffective. Instead, they propose creating an independent agency to oversee the downsizing process, similar to initiatives in the U.S. and the U.K.

On the economic front, the Carney government is relying on its ability to select successful industrial projects through a government-run Major Projects Office. However, some experts believe a better approach would be to solicit proposals from private sector leaders in key industries, particularly in natural resources. This would allow the market and investment community to identify the most critical projects for economic recovery, rather than relying on government decisions. A common request from these sectors would likely be for the federal government to reduce its regulatory and tax burdens.

Federal-provincial relations are also under strain, with tensions rising due to federal overreach into areas traditionally managed by provinces. This has fueled separatist movements in Quebec and Western Canada. An alternative solution proposed is the introduction of a federal Act Respecting Provincial Sovereignty. This act would aim to repeal or amend laws that allow federal intrusion into provincial jurisdictions, such as natural resources and health care. Advocates for this approach argue that both levels of government should focus on their respective responsibilities, with the federal government concentrating on areas like foreign affairs and defense.

Additionally, the ongoing tariff disputes with the U.S. are impacting Canadian jobs and prices. Critics have noted that the Carney administration's strategy of imposing and then retracting counter-tariffs has been inconsistent. An alternative strategy could involve engaging directly with U.S. sectors that are crucial for energy self-sufficiency. This would include seeking support from Trump's political base and communicating through media channels that resonate with that audience. By fostering these relationships, the Carney government could work towards more effective tariff policies that benefit both nations.