British Columbians are questioning the provincial government's approach to reconciliation, which some view as economically damaging and divisive. Premier David Eby is at the center of this debate, having surrounded himself with advisors who advocate for a transformative ideology regarding Indigenous relations. One advisor has controversially likened Canada's formation to an "original sin," suggesting that redemption requires significant societal upheaval. In a recent video, Eby hinted at this perspective, stating that changes stemming from B.C.'s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) aim to rectify what he called an "original colonial mistake." This philosophy is not new among Eby's advisors. Doug White, who serves as special counsel to the premier on reconciliation, and Dr. Roshan Danesh, a facilitator on reconciliation, have both been instrumental in shaping B.C.'s Indigenous policies. Their work includes the implementation of DRIPA, which aligns with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). White and Danesh have been recognized for their roles in the Haida agreement, which set a precedent by acknowledging Aboriginal title over private property in B.C. This agreement has raised concerns among property owners, particularly following the B.C. Supreme Court's Cowichan decision, which has created legal uncertainties. In a joint article published in 2023, White and Danesh expressed their vision for reconciliation, describing it as a "turbulent transition" and a moment of "rupture." They argue that true reconciliation necessitates a complete reorganization of societal structures. "We cannot build the new on infirm foundations," they wrote, emphasizing the need for persistent and bold efforts to achieve their goals. The article likens the process of reconciliation to a person coming of age, where outdated practices and beliefs must be discarded. During legislative discussions in 2024, former Indigenous Relations Minister Murray Rankin defended the article's language, stating it did not seem extreme and asserting that reconciliation "is not for sissies." Danesh has previously criticized the notion of harmony in the face of injustice, arguing that it merely conceals existing systems of oppression. He emphasized that the genuine work of building unity requires confronting these challenges head-on. As the provincial government continues its reconciliation efforts, the implications of these ideologies and policies remain a topic of significant debate among British Columbians.