Published on : 05 Dec 2025, 11:24 am 3 min read
The Delhi High Court has held that virtual services rendered by a foreign law firm or other establishment not having any physical presence in India cannot be taxed under the India–Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) [Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation v Clifford Chance Pte Ltd] .
A Division Bench of Justices V Kameswar Rao and Vinod Kumar noted that the concept of a “virtual service permanent establishment (PE)” does not exist under the DTAA.
Hence, it rejected the Income Tax Department’s move to tax Clifford Chance Private Limited, one of the largest international law firms, on services rendered remotely from Singapore.
The Court said that it cannot read into treaties concepts not expressl

Bar & Bench

Ommcom News
The Times of India
Hindustan Times
Moneycontrol
US Magazine