AI coding assistants allow developers to move fast and break things, which may not be ideal.

Application security firm Apiiro says that it analyzed code from tens of thousands of repositories and several thousand developers affiliated with Fortune 50 enterprises, to better understand the impact of AI code assistants like Anthropic's Claude Code, OpenAI's GPT-5, and Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro.

AI is fixing the typos but creating the timebombs

The firm found that AI-assisted developers produced three to four times more code than their unassisted peers, but also generated ten times more security issues.

"Security issues" here doesn't mean exploitable vulnerabilities; rather, it covers a broad set of application risks, including added open source dependencies, insecure code patterns, exposed

See Full Page