Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is facing criticism for his approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Since taking office on April 28, Carney has not communicated directly with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a move seen as a diplomatic misstep. His recent decision to recognize the State of Palestine has raised eyebrows, especially since he previously outlined conditions that have not been met.

Carney's actions have sparked debate about his understanding of the complex dynamics in the region. In late July, he spoke with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, discussing potential peace parameters with Israel. Following this conversation, Carney's office announced Canada’s intention to recognize Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly, contingent on certain conditions, including democratic reforms and elections in 2026.

Critics argue that Carney's endorsement of Abbas, who has been in power for nearly two decades without holding elections, is misguided. Abbas, an 89-year-old leader, has seen Hamas gain significant support among Palestinians, reflecting a shift in political allegiance. Polls indicate that Hamas, which has a strong Islamist agenda, enjoys more than double the support of the Palestinian Authority.

The situation is further complicated by the ideological underpinnings of Hamas, which seeks the destruction of Israel and promotes a global Islamic agenda. Observers note that Carney's push for Western-style democracy in Palestinian society may not align with the prevailing sentiments among Palestinians, who have historically leaned towards more autocratic governance.

In a recent speech at the United Nations, Netanyahu emphasized the long-standing rejection of a Jewish state by Palestinian leadership as a core issue in the conflict. He stated, "The persistent Palestinian rejection of a Jewish state in any boundary is what has driven this conflict for over a century. It is still driving it. It’s not the absence of a Palestinian state; it’s the presence of a Jewish state that is the issue."

As Carney navigates these complex issues, his approach will likely continue to be scrutinized by both domestic and international observers. The unfolding situation in the Middle East remains a critical challenge for liberal democracies, which must balance their values with the realities on the ground.