Leadership requires a focus on pragmatic decision-making that prioritizes national interests. Critics argue that the Canadian government is failing in this regard, particularly concerning its Middle East policy. Recent comments by Mark Carney, who stated he would honor the International Criminal Court's (ICC) arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he visits Canada, have raised concerns about the implications for Canadian diplomacy.

These remarks have been described as detrimental to Canada’s national interests, especially at a time when the country is navigating a trade war with the United States. The need for strategic trade cooperation with the U.S. is underscored by the movement of major companies, such as Stellantis, relocating operations south of the border. Critics assert that Carney's stance could jeopardize Canada’s credibility with its most important ally.

The current government’s approach to foreign policy has been criticized for lacking the maturity and pragmatism necessary to maintain Canada’s constructive role in promoting peace in the Middle East. Observers note that the government’s actions have disrupted the balance and neutrality that have historically characterized Canada’s foreign relations.

A recent poll suggests that Netanyahu is likely to win the next election, which could further complicate Canada’s diplomatic standing in the region. For Canada to maintain its influence in Middle Eastern affairs and continue its aid programs in Palestinian territories, a more nuanced approach is necessary, according to critics.

The ICC's jurisdiction over Israel is also a point of contention. While Israel signed the Rome Statute in 2000, it did not ratify it, leading some to argue that it should not be subject to the ICC's authority. The principle of complementarity in international law suggests that the ICC cannot prosecute cases where a functioning democracy with a robust judicial system exists, as is the case with Israel.

Furthermore, the ICC has stated that it can exercise jurisdiction based on the territorial claims of Palestine, despite ongoing debates about the legitimacy of a Palestinian state under international law. Critics highlight that Canada has historically opposed the establishment of a “State of Quebec,” yet the current government appears willing to recognize a Palestinian state, which they argue undermines Israel’s sovereignty.

The call for Netanyahu’s arrest has been described as morally and diplomatically indefensible, particularly given Israel's long-standing alliance with Canada. Critics contend that such actions create the impression that Canada is siding with Hamas and other groups responsible for violence in the region. They argue that decisions driven by emotion rather than principle could have lasting negative consequences for Canada’s foreign policy and international standing.