In a study published last month in the journal Law and Human Behavior , Yongjie Sun and his colleagues compared the performance of AI jurors and human jurors in a hypothetical criminal case (Sun et al., 2025).

The AI jurors were three large language models (LLMs, also known as chatbots)—two different versions of OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude. The human jurors were 752 university students who had participated in an earlier, separate study conducted by Bailey Fraser and her colleagues (Fraser at al., 2023). All of the jurors evaluated testimonial evidence and rendered a verdict in a case of alleged sexual assault .

If AI jurors can accurately and fairly evaluate the evidence for and against a defendant, they may be superior to human jurors overall. Why? Because AI jurors work

See Full Page