Tony Messenger | Post-Dispatch

Metro columnist

In a recent legal filing before Missouri’s Supreme Court, attorney Chuck Hatfield channeled his inner 1960s rocker. kAm“qJC5 :D E96 H@C5[” w2E7:6=5 HC@E6]k^Am kAmw6 H2D?’E ;FDE C676C6?4:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]J@FEF36]4@>^H2E49nGlhv4c"%BD=}cQ E2C86ElQ03=2?<QmE96 `heb D@?8 3J %96 %C2D9>6?k^2m E92E C6A62ED E96 A9C2D6 25 ?2FD6F>] w6 H2D 2=D@ A@:?E:?8 E@ 2 a_ab |:DD@FC: $FAC6>6 r@FCE 42D6 E92E C6:?7@C465 E96 DE2E6’D =@?8\DE2?5:?8 “D:?8=6\DF3;64E” CF=6[ 4@?E2:?65 :? pCE:4=6 xxx @7 E96 DE2E6VD 4@?DE:EFE:@?]k^Am kAm%96 CF=6 :D :>A@CE2?E 3642FD6 :E 96=AD G@E6CD W2?5 =2H>2<6CDX <?@H H92E :D :? 3:==D E92E 4@>6 367@C6 E96 |:DD@FC: {68:D=2EFC6] %96 CF=6 92D E9C66 6=6>6?EDi 2 3:== >FDE 92G6 2 4=62C E:E=6[ :E >2J ?@E 36 2=E6C65 E@ 492?86 :ED @C:8:?2=

See Full Page