EDMONTON - A judge in Alberta has labeled a newly introduced bill by Premier Danielle Smith’s government as undemocratic. Court of King’s Bench Justice Colin Feasby made this assertion in a ruling issued on Friday in Calgary. The judge was considering arguments regarding the legality of a referendum drive that seeks to determine if Alberta should separate from Canada, a move that may conflict with the Constitution.

On Thursday, Justice Minister Mickey Amery presented a bill that would permit such petition drives to proceed, irrespective of constitutional violations, effectively halting any court reviews. In his ruling, Feasby expressed concern that the government’s decision to alter the rules during the process undermines the integrity of democracy and the judicial system.

"The rule of law plays a critical role with respect to the democratic process where stability of the governing legal regime enhances legitimacy and public confidence in the outcomes of elections and referendums," Feasby stated. He emphasized that changing legislation to bypass a legitimate legal process initiated by an independent officer of the Legislative Assembly is contrary to the principles of a stable and orderly society that the rule of law and democracy require.

Feasby also criticized the government for showing a "cavalier disregard" for limited court resources. Despite his concerns, he noted that he issued his decision because the bill has not yet become law. He believes it is important for Albertans to grasp the complex legal issues involved if the province were to consider leaving Confederation.

In his ruling, Feasby pointed out that Alberta's separation from Canada would violate Treaty rights. However, he indicated that further examination is needed to determine whether these rights permanently prevent Alberta from becoming an independent nation. The implications of this legal debate continue to unfold as the province navigates its political landscape.