Israel's recent military action against Hamas leaders in Doha has sparked widespread condemnation from global leaders, including Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. The Israeli strikes were aimed at senior Hamas figures, who have been responsible for numerous attacks against Israelis over the years. In a statement, Carney described the strikes as an "intolerable expansion of violence" and an affront to Qatar's sovereignty, warning that such actions could escalate regional conflict.

Critics argue that this response highlights a double standard in international reactions to Israel's self-defense actions. They point out that Qatar has long provided sanctuary and resources to Hamas, raising questions about its role as a neutral party in the region. Under international law, specifically Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, a state has the right to defend itself against terrorist attacks, even if those terrorists are being harbored by another nation.

This principle was notably applied when NATO invoked Article 5 after the September 11 attacks, justifying military actions in Afghanistan and the U.S. operation that killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. Observers note that there was little global outcry when American forces entered Pakistan to eliminate bin Laden, suggesting a disparity in how similar actions are perceived based on the countries involved.

The situation escalated after the October 7, 2023, attacks in Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,200 people. This toll, when adjusted for population, is comparable to the murder of 40,000 Americans. Despite this, Israel faces significant criticism for its military response, while Qatar's support for Hamas remains largely overlooked.

Canada has designated Hamas as a terrorist organization, yet critics argue that the Canadian government is failing to hold Qatar accountable for its support of Hamas. Reports from organizations like Amnesty International highlight Qatar's human rights abuses, including discrimination against women and repression of LGBTQ individuals.

While Qatar presents itself as a global mediator and host of high-profile conferences, its financial support for Hamas raises serious concerns. Critics assert that the West has been blinded by Qatari wealth, failing to recognize the implications of its actions in the region.

In light of these developments, Foreign Minister Anita Anand's statement that Canada is re-evaluating its relationship with Israel, rather than Qatar, has drawn criticism. Observers suggest that Israel's strikes in Doha have exposed Qatar's facade as a neutral mediator, challenging its image and complicating diplomatic relations in the West.