Ilaughed out loud the other day when I saw several Republican members of Congress support President Donald Trump’s dubious denial about signing Jeffrey Epstein’s 2003 birthday book. One actually maintained that he had no reason to doubt the president’s word, while another claimed it looked like an obvious forgery to him.

Seriously? Would The Wall Street Journal have published this story unless it consulted experts on whether this was, in fact, The Donald’s John Hancock? Of course not. Not to mention: Why would anyone need or want to forge a Trump signature on a birthday card sent 22 years ago?

The test of common sense suggests otherwise: Isn’t this the same man found civilly liable for sexual abuse? The same man caught on tape bragging about where he likes to grab women? The same man who

See Full Page