Canada's Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand recently presented the country's foreign policy vision at the United Nations, emphasizing three main pillars: defense and security, economic resilience, and core values, which include gender equality and environmental protection. This prioritization has sparked discussions among commentators, suggesting a shift from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's focus on progressive values such as feminism, climate change, and diversity. Anand notably stated, "Canada will not be judged by the strength of our values, but the value of our strength."

Despite this apparent shift, Anand's speech largely defended the United Nations, highlighting the challenges posed by rising unilateralism and protectionism. She remarked on the weakened state of multilateral institutions and the rule of law, which she described as the foundation of the postwar order. Anand asserted, "In the face of these stark realities, retreat is not an option. Canada will not turn inward."

Her remarks came in the wake of U.S. President Donald Trump's criticisms of the UN, which included comments about its operational shortcomings. Anand's commitment to multilateralism aligns with the broader Canadian approach, as exemplified by Prime Minister Mark Carney's previous role as the UN special envoy on climate change.

However, the effectiveness of the UN has been called into question. Critics argue that the organization has been co-opted by nations more interested in pursuing their own agendas than in promoting democracy and free markets. They point to the UN's focus on condemning Israel while overlooking human rights violations in other countries, as well as the leadership of human rights abusers in its committees.

The historical context of this dynamic can be traced back to the mid-20th century decolonization movement, which was supported by both progressive advocates and nations like Russia and China. This movement aimed to dismantle Western dominance, leading to a shift in global attitudes and debates within the UN.

Anand's call for Canada to uphold the current international order comes at a time when the U.S. has expressed frustration with the UN's perceived hypocrisy. The U.S. contributes 22 percent of the UN's $3.5 billion budget, with China following at 20 percent. The U.S. also leads the peacekeeping budget, contributing 26 percent compared to China's 24 percent. In contrast, Canada ranks eighth, contributing 2.5 percent to both budgets, while many member states contribute less than 1 percent.

The question of whether the UN is worth its cost remains contentious. Critics argue that if the organization continues to undermine the rights and principles it was established to uphold, its value is diminished. As alliances evolve, countries are increasingly prioritizing national interests and sovereignty over universal institutions. In this context, Canada’s security strategy may require a reevaluation of its alliances and a focus on concrete actions to protect its way of life, rather than relying solely on diplomatic speeches at the UN.