All the leading legal experts in the country had once pointed out that the verdict of the two-judge bench of the Supreme Court last April, which set a three-month deadline for the President and the Governors to take further action on bills passed by the Assembly, was wrong. The Constitution does not provide for such a time limit, so the court does not have the legal authority to set a time limit of three months. The two-judge bench's judgment was one of the biggest examples of how court judgments can be made even after the law is passed. The power to set a time limit lies with Parliament. That too, if the Constitutional Amendment Bill is passed in a manner that complies with the prescribed criteria. This is something that any citizen with a basic education knows. The court has the power to
Five-member bench's reply to 14 constitutional questions referred by President
Kerala Kaumudi1 hrs ago
77


The Print
RadarOnline
NFL Los Angeles Rams
Alliance Review
AlterNet
NFL Seattle Seahawks
The Babylon Bee