OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney is moving away from the feminist foreign policy established during Justin Trudeau's administration. At a news conference on Sunday, before leaving the G20 summit in Johannesburg, Carney stated that Canada’s approach to foreign policy will no longer be defined by feminist principles.

"Yes, we have that aspect to our foreign policy, but I wouldn’t describe (Canadian) foreign policy as ‘feminist foreign policy,'" Carney said when asked about the government's focus on gender-based issues. He emphasized that while gender equality remains important, it is not the sole focus of Canadian foreign policy.

This shift marks a significant departure from Trudeau's decade-long emphasis on gender equality as a core principle of his administration. Trudeau famously highlighted gender representation in his cabinet, stating, "It’s 2015" when asked about the gender balance among his ministers.

Carney's government has already begun to reverse several key policies from the Trudeau era, including the elimination of the consumer carbon tax. The Carney administration is prioritizing a broader range of issues, including economic stability and international trade, while still acknowledging the importance of gender-based violence and equality.

During the press conference, Carney noted the ongoing challenges related to gender-based violence, particularly in South Africa, where femicide has been declared a national disaster. He stated, "The work on gender-based violence, the work on female equality is one of the priorities of the South African presidency (of the G20)."

Carney's remarks reflect a broader strategy to redefine Canada’s international priorities. He has been actively engaging with global leaders, focusing on economic issues and trade agreements. Since taking office, he has visited at least 17 countries and participated in discussions with leaders from nations such as China and India.

Despite his efforts to promote Canada’s interests abroad, Carney faces challenges at home. His recent budget received mixed reviews, with some critics arguing that it exacerbated existing financial issues. The Fraser Institute criticized the budget for excessive spending and insufficient savings, while other sources acknowledged its ambitious goals but expressed skepticism about their feasibility.

As Carney continues to navigate the complexities of international relations and domestic policy, he aims to establish a distinct identity for his government, separate from Trudeau's legacy. The Carney administration is working to balance various interests while addressing the pressing issues facing Canada today.

The prime minister's approach suggests a shift in priorities, as he seeks to redefine Canada’s role on the global stage while still addressing important social issues.