In a pivotal legal showdown, the Supreme Court, helmed by Chief Justice John Roberts, may overturn a ruling that has prevented presidents from unilaterally removing heads of independent agencies. This case revisits the 1935 Humphrey's Executor decision, heightening focus on the unitary executive theory, which advocates broad presidential power.

Conservative justices appear inclined to dismantle existing constraints, paving the way for enhanced executive authority. This follows a recent trend where the court, under Roberts' guidance, has bolstered presidential power by enabling firings across various government boards, thus challenging restrictive precedents.

As deliberations unfold, questions persist over historical interpretations of executive power. Legal observers, including prominent

See Full Page