A significant change has occurred in Canada's diplomatic stance toward Israel. For nearly 80 years, Canada has recognized Israel's right to exist and defend itself. Historically, Canada has rejected the refusal of Israel's Arab neighbors and the Palestinians to acknowledge Israel as a Jewish state. Prominent figures like Lester B. Pearson, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for proposing the United Nations Emergency Force in 1956, believed that Israel deserved peace among the nations.

However, under Prime Minister Mark Carney, Canada's policy has shifted dramatically. The current administration now aligns with countries like Ireland, China, and Russia, which are known for their critical stance toward Israel. Relations between Israel and Ireland have soured to the extent that Israel recalled its ambassador earlier this year. South Africa and Spain have also been vocal in their criticism of Israel's actions, particularly following the October 7 attacks.

Since Carney took office, Canada has taken several actions that reflect this new approach. In May, after Israeli Defense Forces fired warning shots at a United Nations delegation in Gaza, Carney and Foreign Minister Anita Anand issued strong condemnations. Critics argue that entering an active war zone is inherently dangerous, and Canada's response was seen as disproportionate.

In July, Carney accused Israel of violating international law and intentionally starving the people of Gaza amid the ongoing conflict. While Israel's handling of aid to Gaza has faced criticism, it is essential to note that Hamas initiated the conflict. This distinction is crucial in understanding the complexities of the situation.

Canada has also condemned Israel's military operations in Gaza, reiterating calls for Hamas to release hostages and disband. Observers question whether Canadian officials genuinely believe Hamas would comply with such demands. Recently, Canada threatened to reassess its relations with Israel following Israeli airstrikes in Qatar, which were criticized as reckless given the ongoing hostage situation.

Canada's rhetoric has shifted from diplomatic objections in the past, such as during the 1956 Suez Crisis, to a more confrontational tone today. The current government appears to align itself with nations that support Palestinian statehood, influenced by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas's promises of reform and elections.

Several factors may explain this shift in policy. One possibility is that Carney may not support the Jewish state. Another factor could be the demographic changes in Canada, where the Muslim population now significantly outnumbers the Jewish population. This evolving political landscape may be influencing Canada's foreign policy decisions.